![toweb sucks toweb sucks](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/de7EcQsUGVE/maxresdefault.jpg)
System integration is inherently expensive and time-consuming, and most enterprise projects require more system integration than anything else.Ĭustomers prefer flashy (but only marginally useful) features over systems which are simple and robust. Price-sensitive bidding which discourages extra expenses like design and testing.
Toweb sucks software#
Overpromising the capabilities of new technology.Ī system of software vendors (Oracle and its ilk) and systems integrators (Accenture and its ilk) which makes it easy to blame someone else for failure, and encourages drawing out failing projects to the bitter end. Too much focus on short-term gains (both to the vendor and project ROI) at the expense of building robust and stable systems. Chances are that it's a combination of factors: There are lots of reasons why technology sucks, and I don't know which are most important. But in the world of IT, where technology sucks, this is the norm.
![toweb sucks toweb sucks](https://cdn.business2community.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/AMP.PNG-900x507.png)
Companies would never accept this dismal level of performance from other major capital expenditures-imagine if there was only a 10% chance that a new office tower would function as designed, and less than a 50% chance that it would even remain standing after being completed. Some consultants claim that over half of all big technology projects fail at one level or another, and that nearly all never meet all the initial objectives.
![toweb sucks toweb sucks](https://psychostick.com/images/comics/RAWRB_1301721480_26-Crate-Sucks-web.jpg)
In fact, at my prior job, I lived through two failed CRM projects in the space of less than five years. Yet companies continue to launch CRM projects. Those are the same publications which are generally in the business of promoting new technologies. It crashes weekly, and has been down for hours and even once for days at a time.Ī consulting firm I know once privately described its business model to me as "cleaning up after Accenture." This firm employed about 150 programmers, and the majority of its business was essentially picking up the pieces of big failed projects and trying to get something to work.Ĭustomer Relationship Management software sucks so badly that googling " Why do CRM projects fail" returns over a million hits, and industry publications regularly run articles on the topic. But here are some examples I've observed in my travels:Ī client of mine recently migrated one of its mission-critical systems to a new technology. Maybe I'm painting things with too-broad of a brush. If a company spent more than a million dollars on it in the past twenty years, it probably sucks. I'm talking about everything in IT, from databases to web sites to Three Letter Acronym implementations (CRM, SFA, SCM, etc.). In comparison, home technology (for all its shortcomings) is extremely robust, stable, and usable.Īnd I'm not just talking about the well-known limitations of certain Microsoft products. Technology, and in particular the giant systems which big companies buy, usually doesn't work properly, if at all.